Legal Opinion

Pryor Motor Co. v. Hartsfield

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 8, 1922No. 6 Div. 533PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

The theory of the bill of complaint is that complainant" is entitled to have the automobile, in which he has an interest to the extent of his lien for unpaid purchase money, brought before the Jefferson county circuit court in equity by bill for condemnation under the laws of the state, and therefore that he is entitled to prevent its delivery to the federal authorities for proceedings under 'the federal laws.

The grounds upon which this asserted right is based are: (1) That his lien cannot be asserted under federal laws, and if the car should be delivered to the federal authorities, as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gulf Compress Co. v. Harris, Cortner & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  2. State ex rel. Brickman v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  3. Torbert v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Armstrong v. O'NealSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  5. Friedman v. FraserSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Chilton County v. ButlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Dennis v. PratherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Birmingham Interurban Taxicab Service Corp. v. McLendonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  4. Persons v. SummersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  5. State Ex Rel. Foshee v. ButlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API