Dupree v. . Moore
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
The defendant appellee depends partly on existence of a. parol contract to convey tbe lands in controversy and partly on the principle of estoppel in pais to support recovery under his cross action. But the alleged parol contract to convey is not supported by the evidence against all the plaintiffs; estoppel in pais is not pleadable against the admitted minors nor is there supporting evidence as to all of the adult, plaintiffs.
1. "Where there has been a parol contract to convey lands and the statute of frauds is invoked by the promissor, we say, in shorthand, that the contract is void. It…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Eaton v. . DoubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Doster v. . EnglishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Shives v. Eno Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Jernigan v. . NeighborsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Union Central Life Insurance v. CordonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kline v. LightmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Pamlico County v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Olson v. Tri-County State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Wells v. ForemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952