In re the Detention of Kistenmacher
Washington Supreme Court
1Concurrence
¶27
(concurring) — I concur in the result and with the majority’s analysis that there is no estoppel against the State. I write separately because I do not agree that the sexually violent predator (SVP) act, chapter 71.09 RCW, creates a statutory right to counsel at precommitment psychological evaluations. The plain language of the statute is ambiguous, and application of the canons of statutory construction does not support a right to counsel at these psychological evaluations.
Fairhurst, J.
¶28 Chapter 71.09 RCW was enacted to remedy the inadequate ability of Washington’s civil commitment…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Cox v. HeleniusWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. RilesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.