Legal Opinion
Ristesund v. Johnson & Johnson
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided June 29, 2018No. ED 104887PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKurt S. Odenwald, Judge
Introduction
Johnson & Johnson ("J&J") and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. ("JJCI")1 (collectively, "Defendants") appeal the trial court's judgment after a jury verdict in favor of Gloria Ristesund ("Ristesund") on her product-liability claims. Ristesund concedes that the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction over Defendants, and requests that we remand this matter to allow her the opportunity to renew the case and present evidence of personal jurisdiction in light of the United States Supreme Court holding in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California. --- U.S. ----, 137…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lois Slemp, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc., n/k/a Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., and Imerys Talc America, Inc., f/k/a Luzenac America, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- Robert Ingham v. Johnson & JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020