Champagne v. Equitable Credit Union (In Re Champagne)

DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

ARTHUR N. VOTOLATO, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

Before the Court is the Debtor’s Motion for Reconsideration of our September 25, 1992 Decision and Order, wherein we de nied the Debtor’s request for relief based on his failure to properly allege a violation of the discharge injunction under 11 U.S.C. § 524(a) 145 B.R. 122. 1

The Debtor’s initial criticism of our September 25 ruling is that the Court (incorrectly) relied upon the parties’ “inartfully[sic] drafted joint pre-trial order” in finding that Equitable Credit Union (“ECU”) had the right to…