Legal Opinion

In Re Narragansett Clothing Co.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided January 3, 1995No. Bankruptcy 90-10149PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C.’S, REQUEST FOR RELIEF AFTER RECONSIDERATION OF DECISION AND ORDER DATED NOVEMBER h, 1993

ARTHUR N. VOTOLATO, Bankruptcy Judge.

Before the Court is the Motion for Reconsideration filed by the law firm Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. (“Mintz Levin”), seeking relief from our November 4,1993 Order Setting Final Compensation in the amount of $420,000 for Services, and Ordering Disgorgement of $68,000 which we determined was excessive. The Order now under reconsideration concerns, inter alia, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Wedgestone FinancialUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1992
  2. Champagne v. Equitable Credit Union (In Re Champagne)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island · 1992
  3. In Re Narragansett Clothing Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Almacs, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island · 1995
  2. In re Narragansett Clothing Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API