Legal Opinion

United States v. John Doe, a Juvenile

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 18, 1984No. CA 83-3068PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

John Doe, a juvenile, appeals the district court’s revocation of his probation, contending that the court erred in refusing to disclose a confidential sentencing recommendation and erred in placing him in a California treatment facility.

BACKGROUND

John Doe, a juvenile and Idaho resident, pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter. On March 9, 1983, he was placed on probation for three years, subject to certain conditions.

In the weeks following his placement on probation, John Doe violated the terms and conditions of his probation on several occasions. John Doe’s probation officer, Stuart…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Harry Aleman and Leonard ForestaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  2. United States v. Edmundo Howard-AriasCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. James S. Stinson v. Louis S. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Joe S. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Lyle v. SivleyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1992
  3. Scott v. RenoDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1995
  4. United States v. DoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API