Legal Opinion
United States v. Joe S. Gonzales
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 16, 1985No. 84-3071, 84-3109PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
Gonzales appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to correct or reduce sentence under rule 35, Fed.R. Crim.P., and from the denial of his motion to reconsider the rule 35 motion. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
I
In 1984, Gonzales pleaded guilty to an information charging one count of forgery of a United States Treasury check, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 495. Prior to imposing sentence, the district court ordered a pre-sentence report pursuant to rule 32(c), Fed. R.Crim.P. The report was disclosed to Gonzales, except for the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pennsylvania Ex Rel. Sullivan v. AsheSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Kenneth D. Oxborrow, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Kenneth O. Eikenberry, Norman Carlson, Respondents-Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. David Keith BelgardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Michael Francis Johnson, United States of America v. Ricardo Bernard SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. H. Wayne Hayes, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. McHughCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.