Samuel H. Cottrell & Son v. Smokeless Fuel Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.
1Opinion of the Court
BOYD, District Judge.
The plaintiffs are residents and citizens of the city of Richmond, in the Eastern district of the state of Virginia, and the defendant, the Smokeless Fuel Company, a West Virginia corporation doing business in the said city of Richmond. On the 17th of April, 3902, a written contract was entered into between the plaintiffs, Samuel II. Cottrell & Son, and the defendant, the Smokeless Fuel Company, as follows:
‘•This agreement, entered into- this 17th day of April, 1902, by and between the Smokeless Fuel Company, party of the first part, and S. II. Cottrell & Son, party of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dermott v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Pindell v. MullikinSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
3Cited by9 opinions
- United Steed Co. v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920
- Acme Mfg. Co. v. Arminius Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1919
- Capital Fertilizer Co. v. Ashcraft-Wilkinson Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Vandalia Coal Co. v. UnderwoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
- Jackson Phosphate Co. v. Caraleigh Phosphate & Fertilizer WorksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.