Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Neer v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1978No. 77-622PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant is actually seeking a declaratory judgment, since the Court of Appeals has no basis for issuing the mandamus order requested unless it makes a determination that R. C. 4123.68 (X) is unconstitutional.

This court stated in State, ex rel. Foreman, v. Bellefontaine Municipal Court (1967), 12 Ohio St. 2d 26, at page 28, as follows:

“Statutes which create a declaratory judgment procedure do not extend the jurisdiction of the subject matter of a court but rather extend the power of the court to grant declaratory relief within its respective jurisdiction. In other words, declaratory judgment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Foreman v. Bellefontaine Municipal CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. San Ysidro Irrigation District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Coyne v. TodiaOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Ryan v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Wright v. GheeOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Duncan v. Am. Transm. Sys., Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
  5. State Ex Rel. Paluf v. FeneliOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API