Legal Opinion
Kenart & Associates v. Skagit County
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 16, 1984No. 10737-2-IPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Johnsen, J. *
Kenart & Associates (Kenart) owns land in Skagit County which it wished to develop. The Board of County Commissioners denied Kenart's application for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Kenart sought review by way of writ of review. The Superior Court affirmed the decision of the Board and Kenart has appealed.
The findings of fact, which are not challenged, are as follows:
1. Plaintiff Kenart and Associates filed an application with defendant Skagit County for a preliminary plat of Kenart Estates, an 80 lot, 79.5 acre Planned Unit Development located approximately three miles…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pierce County Sheriff v. Civil Service CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Loveless v. YantisWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. RoweWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Lutz v. City of LongviewWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Department of Natural Resources v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Sunderland Family Treatment Services v. City of PascoWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Cingular Wireless, LLC v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Maranatha Mining, Inc. v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
- Cingular Wireless, LLC v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Nagatani Brothers, Inc. v. Skagit County Board of CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.