Legal Opinion

Maranatha Mining, Inc. v. Pierce County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 10, 1990No. 12951-5-IIPublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorswick, J.

We reverse the Pierce County Council's denial of Maranatha Mining's1 application for an unclassified use permit to operate a surface gravel mine and asphalt plant, and we direct that the permit be issued.

Maranatha owns a 60-acre parcel in a general use zone near McMillan on which it wants to conduct gravel mining and asphalt manufacturing. Such uses are permitted in general use zones under unclassified use permits. The first hearing on Maranatha's permit application took place on December 20, 1985, before a hearing examiner who considered a multitude of exhibits and heard several experts…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Myhre v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State Ex Rel. Standard Mining & Development Corp. v. City of AuburnWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Cougar Mountain Associates v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Pentagram Corp. v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  5. Grader v. City of LynnwoodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State Ex Rel. Lige & Wm. B. Dickson Co. v. County of PierceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  4. Klickitat County Citizens Against Imported Waste v. Klickitat CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Sunderland Family Treatment Services v. City of PascoWashington Supreme Court · 1995

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API