Legal Opinion

In re Mutual Savings Bank Securities Litigation

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided May 9, 1996No. 95-CV-71590PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*379 OPINION AND ORDER

FEIKENS, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This action has been brought to address alleged fraudulent conduct, on behalf of Defendant Mutual Savings Bank, f.s.b. (“Mutual” or “the Bank”), a federally chartered stock savings bank headquartered in Bay City, Michigan, by certain of its former and/or current officers and directors (“the Individual Defendants”), in violation of: Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and § 78t(a); Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“the SEC”), 17 C.F.R. §…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  5. In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Weikel v. Tower Semiconductor Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
  2. In Re Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2007
  3. Ross v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009
  4. Bovee v. Coopers & LybrandDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
  5. Yadlosky v. Grant Thornton L.L.P.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API