Inge v. Lichtenstein

87 F.3d 1319

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

William INGE, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Max LICHTENSTEIN, Defendant-Appellant,

and

Beatrice J. Berry; City of Medford; Moss, Lt.; John W.

Bondurant; Bill, Deputy Chief; Moran, Sgt; Tim

George; Dave Ryder; Gary Armstrong;

John Does 1-10, Defendants.

No. 95-35027.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 11, 1996.*

Decided…