Wilmer v. Placide

This Court expressed, at the time, the regret it felt in being compelled to reverse the judgment reviewed in Wilmer v. Placide, 137 Md. 107, by reason of the error of the lower court in refusing, to permit the plaintiff to introduce any further testimony in the case. Y7e referred to* the fact that there were seven counts in the declaration, only two- of which in terms named the Madison Avenue property, connected with .which there had been so much litigation, and that there had been no demurrer filed to' the declaration or to any of the counts in it. After citing some decisions to show that,…