Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. Floyd

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 13, 1969No. 44379PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Chief Judge.

Count One. The trial judge ruled that the Act of 1966 is constitutional and there is no cross appeal from that ruling. Otherwise, the court erred in sustaining the motions to dismiss the actions as to Count 1 against Mr. and Mrs. Floyd.

Count 1 in each case states a claim even without the allegations therein to the effect that the parents knew of the dangerous and vicious propensities of their son. Under the amendment to the Act of 1956 (Ga. L. 1956, p. 699) now appearing in Code Ann. § 105-113 (Ga. L. 1966, p. 424) a cause of action could be made out against either or both…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harper v. DeFreitasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  2. Bazemore v. BurnetCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Corley v. LewlessSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  2. Dunaway v. KaylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  3. Muse v. OzmentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Parsons v. SmitheyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  5. Poythress v. WallsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API