Semple v. Griswold
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
III. Discussion
A. Standard of Review
The district court denied Defendant's motion to dismiss based on its conclusion Plaintiffs were entitled to judgment on the pleadings as a matter of law. We review this ruling de novo. Utah Republican Party v. Cox , 892 F.3d 1066, 1076 (10th Cir. 2018).
B. Fourteenth Amendment Claim
Because this matter was decided on the pleadings, this court turns first to the allegations in Plaintiffs' complaint. There is, of course, no dispute that Section 2.5 requires proponents of ballot initiatives to collect signatures from two percent of the registered voters in each…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wooley v. MaynardSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Meyer v. GrantSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Initiative & Referendum Institute v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Montana Green Party v. Christi JacobsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Advance Colorado v. GriswoldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
- Are You Listening Yet PAC v. HendersonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2024
- Arizonans for Second Chances v. HobbsArizona Supreme Court · 2020
- Brooke Henderson v. Springfield R-12 School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.