Legal Opinion

Barajas Centeno v. City of Carlsbad

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 13, 2022No. 3:19-cv-02098Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE LUIS BARAJAS CENTENO, Case No.: 19-cv-2098-GPC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 13 v. RECONSIDERATION OF ECF NO. 200 14 CITY OF CARLSBAD; JORDAN WALKER; and DOES 1 through 10, 15 [ECF No. 206] Defendants. 16 17 On April 21, 2022, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Reconsideration of ECF No. 200, 18 styled as a “Motion to Reopen Order Denying Striking Transcript July 22: 2020: Newly 19 Discovered Evidence.” ECF No. 206. Defendants responded in opposition. ECF No. 209. 20 The Court finds this matter…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fuller v. M.G. JewelryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Elizabeth Albright Latshaw v. Trainer Wortham & Company, Inc., a Corporation Robert J. Vile, a Natural PersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. Rose Maree Jones v. Aero/chem Corp. And Athea Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Fantasyland Video, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Alexander v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API