Legal Opinion

Hilda B. v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 20, 1996PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anne Targum, J.), entered November 29, 1994, which denied petitioners’ motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim nunc pro tunc upon respondent, is unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, and the motion is granted, without costs or disbursements.

On October 2, 1993, petitioner, Hilda B., was attacked and sexually abused and molested by a dishevelled "street person” in her apartment building owned and operated by the respondent Housing Authority. The attack took place in the stairway of the premises while…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Joseph v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Jacqueline G. v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Heron v. StraderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Nacipucha v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Price v. HersticAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. F. P. v. HersticAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Heron v. StraderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API