Bolding v. Camp
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtHall, C. J.
By agreement of all parties, the appellant has been permitted to file new-briefs, and the case is now before us for determination upon the merits. The record contains no copy of any of the pleadings, and the controversy is submitted by a brief statement of the case under R. S. art. 2280. The substance of the statement is that the appellant Bolding was one of the defendants in a consolidated cause upon the docket of the district court of Wichita county. The court consolidated several cases, filed by different plaintiffs, against the same defendants, among them being W. P. Bolding, appellant,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Thompson v. SchmittTexas Supreme Court · 1925
- Munsey v. Mills & GarittyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- Hollister v. McCameyTexas Supreme Court · 1925
- Griffin v. ReillyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Victor Refining Co. v. City National Bank of CommerceTexas Supreme Court · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.