Legal Opinion
John v. City Of Akron
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 22, 2002No. 00-3050Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
290 F.3d 813
John V. FRANK; Marco Sommerville; John W. Valle; Robert G. Konstand; Gerald Holland; Nancy Heslop; Charles Walker, Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants,
v.
CITY OF AKRON, Defendant-Appellee,
Bruce Kilby; Mike Parsons; Patricia Longville; Gregory D. Coleridge; the Yes on 11 Campaign, Intervenors-Appellants/Cross-Appellees.
No. 00-3050.
No. 00-3070.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Argued: November 29, 2001.
Decided and Filed: May 22, 2002.
Robert M. Gippin (argued and briefed), Karen Kelly Grasso (briefed), Thompson Hine, Cleveland, OH, for…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Merritt; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PACSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- National Black Police Association v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Thomas D. Carver v. Jeremiah W. Nixon, Attorney General, State of Missouri John Maupin, Chair, Missouri Ethics CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.