Legal Opinion

Julie Postma, et al. v. Carolynn Comstock, et al.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided January 26, 2026No. 2:25-cv-02036Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 7 8 JULIE POSTMA, et al. 9 Plaintiff, NO. 2:25-CV-02036-SAB 10 v. 11 CAROLYNN COMSTOCK, et al., ORDER GRANTING MOTION 12 Defendants. TO DISMISS; REMANDING 13 ACTION 14 15 Before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Julie Postma and Kathleen DeMaria and 16 Third-party City of Seattle’ Defendant’s Stipulated Motion for Order Clarifying 17 Removal, ECF No. 15, Third-party Defendant Google, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss, 18 ECF No. 10, Third-party City of Seattle Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 19 16, and Third-party Defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API