Julie Postma, et al. v. Carolynn Comstock, et al.
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 7 8 JULIE POSTMA, et al. 9 Plaintiff, NO. 2:25-CV-02036-SAB 10 v. 11 CAROLYNN COMSTOCK, et al., ORDER GRANTING MOTION 12 Defendants. TO DISMISS; REMANDING 13 ACTION 14 15 Before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Julie Postma and Kathleen DeMaria and 16 Third-party City of Seattle’ Defendant’s Stipulated Motion for Order Clarifying 17 Removal, ECF No. 15, Third-party Defendant Google, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss, 18 ECF No. 10, Third-party City of Seattle Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 19 16, and Third-party Defendant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.