Legal Opinion

In re the Accounting of Levin

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 1951PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDye, J.

The parties to this proceeding in the nature of an intermediate accounting are the executors of the will of the deceased father, Morris Levin. Herman is the son of the decedent by his first marriage. He files a voluntary account to which the others, Belle Burrill and Max Levin, children by decedent’s second marriage, have filed objections, consisting of *539several specifications, the principal of which and the one decisive of this appeal, is whether the testator in his lifetime agreed with his wife, Yetta, to bequeath his entire estate to their children in equal shares.

It appears that on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Patch v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Stulsaft v. Mercer Tube & Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1942

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Intercontinental Planning, Ltd. v. Daystrom Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Rubin v. Irving Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Oursler v. ArmstrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. Custis v. Valley National Bank of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Talco Contractors, Inc. v. New York State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API