Haussler v. Wilson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.
Respondents began this action to obtain a decree declaring rescinded a transaction whereunder appellant had purchased from them five shares of the capital stock of the Bank of Davis. The judgment granted this relief, and the court denied a motion for a new trial. This appeal followed.
By their complaint respondents alleged that the sale of the shares of stock had been induced by fraudulent representations made to them by appellant. The trial court found these allegations to be true. Appellant’s attack on the judgment raises the single issue of the sufficiency of the evidence to support these…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Trebelhorn v. BartlettNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
- County National Bank & Trust Co. v. SheppardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Gorham v. Massillon Iron & Steel Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1918
- Arneson v. NergerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Robert B. Allen v. Devon Energy Holdings, L.L.C. F/K/A Chief Holdings, L.L.C, and Trevor D. Rees-Jones, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
- Brown v. HalbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Santoro v. CarboneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Low v. WheelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Bailey v. VaughanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.