Kimsey v. Fore
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
KEITH, Justice.
Plaintiffs below appeal from a take nothing judgment entered after the trial court granted defendants’ motions for judgment non obstante veredicto. The principal question presented is what obligation, if any, is owed by the holder of the executive right to the owners of nonparticipating mineral interests. 1
1. Factual Recitation
Suit was brought by plaintiffs as the owners of nonparticipating term royalty against several sets of parties:(1) The McCampbell grantor-lessors, the owners of Vsths of the mineral interest who had sold one-half of the royalty from an 854-acre ranch in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Burt v. LochausenTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Waggoner Estate v. Sigler Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
- Leyva v. PachecoTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Schlittler v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1937
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Manges v. GuerraTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- De Benavides v. Warren, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984
- Pickens v. Hope, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1988
- Hlavinka v. Hancock, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
- Comanche Land and Cattle Co., Inc. v. Adams, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.