Legal Opinion

Whitten v. Bird

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided July 25, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor:

The demurrer sets out fourteen causes. The solicitor for the demurrant, however, confined the demurrer to the grounds herein stated.

1. The complainant, as such, is said not to be a proper party to the suit. This objection appears to be based on the fact that the monthly payments called for by the agreement are not for the benefit of the complainant personally but solely for her children. The complainant, however, has the care and custody of the children. She has been supporting and maintaining them. The monthly payments are to supply her with the means of discharging her duty…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Edleson v. EdlesonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  2. Peters v. PetersCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1933
  3. G. W. Baker Machine Co. v. U. S. Fire Apparatus Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1916
  4. Ward v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  5. Sharpless-Hendler Ice Cream Co. v. DavisCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Zouck v. ZouckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Burke v. BurkeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
  3. Burke v. BurkeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
  4. Zouck v. ZouckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API