Legal Opinion · Dissent

Scalise v. Sewell-Scheuermann

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 2018No. 2016-SC-000246-DGPublished

1Dissent

VENTERS, J., DISSENTING:

I agree with the Majority's conclusion that Audubon Park's sanitation assessment is a tax. However, I respectfully dissent because the Majority errs in applying the so-called "offset defense" to reduce the liability established by KRS 92.340 when private citizens initiate actions against public officials who violate § 180 of the Kentucky Constitution. The General Assembly has expressly defined the amount of liability owed by public officials who violate KRS 92.340, and the Court's obligation is to enforce the statute as written by the legislature. I also dissent from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Beckham v. Bd. of Educ. of Jefferson Cty.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. GaitherwrightKentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  3. City of Newport v. McLaneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  4. Pennyrile Allied Community Services, Inc. v. RogersKentucky Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Duncan v. CombsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API