Legal Opinion

People v. Friday

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 18, 1936No. Crim. 1930PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

The defendant Friday and one Fonseca were tried together and both convicted of robbery in the first degree. Both defendants admitted a prior conviction and service of sentence in the state penitentiary for separate crimes of robbery. The defendant Friday prosecuted a separate appeal from the judgment and the order denying him a new trial.

The two defendants held up a drug store in the city of San Jose at about 12:30 in the afternoon of March 28, 1936. While Friday held a gun upon the proprietor, Fonseca took the money from the cash register, a wallet containing money from the pocket of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. FarringtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. People v. ErnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. People v. PiersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. BraunCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. People v. HouserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. People v. EudyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. People v. BeltowskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API