Legal Opinion

People v. Pierson

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 17, 1934No. Crim. No. 2542PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, J., pro tem.

Appellants were convicted of two counts of robbery in the first degree. Pierson and DelFante had each been charged with and had admitted a prior felony conviction. From the judgment and from the order denying motion for a new trial this appeal is taken on the ground (1) that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict and (2) that a separate trial should have been ordered as to DelFante.

Appellants entered the house of the witness Campbell, pointed a gun at the latter and his wife and tied them up with wire and adhesive tape. Another witness, Lange, entered and was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. ErnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. People v. TinninCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. People v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. People v. MeyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. SantoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. People v. EudyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. People v. FridayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. State v. MillerUtah Supreme Court · 1947
  5. People v. LegerrettaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API