Gentry v. Floyd County
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO CERTIFY CLASS
RICHARD L. YOUNG, CHIEF JUDGE
Plaintiffs, Tabitha Gentry, Vincent Minton, Michael Herron, Adam Walker, Brian Burgess, Anna Chastain, and Janelle South, are a group of detainees who were housed in padded isolation cells of the Floyd County Jail in conditions they claim were unconstitutional. Before the court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification. For the reasons that follow, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification is GRANTED.
I. Background
In 2010, the Floyd County Sheriffs Department issued a policy statement entitled “Combative Subjects…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Herbert L. Board v. Karl Farnham, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- WEBSTER v. CITY OF NOBLESVILLEDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020
- XIRUM v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE)District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2024