Legal Opinion
Hsin Ten Enterprise USA, Inc. v. Clark Enterprises
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 5, 2001No. 00 CIV. 5878(SAS)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
This is a patent infringement action in which plaintiff Hsin Ten Enterprise USA, Inc. (“Hsin Ten”) alleges that defendant Clark Enterprises infringed upon Hsin Ten’s United States Design Patent number Des. 329,499 (“the ’499 patent” or “design patent”). See Defendant Clark Enterprises Memorandum re: Patent Claim Construction (“Def.Mem.”) at 1.
Before the fact-finder can determine whether there has been infringement, the Court must first construe the patent claim to ascertain its meaning and scope as a matter of law. See Markman v. Westview…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Avia Group International, Inc., (Formerly Pensa, Inc.) v. L.A. Gear California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Torspo Hockey International, Inc. v. Kor Hockey Ltd.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- Metrokane, Inc. v. Wine EnthusiastDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Hosley International Trading Corp. v. K Mart Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
- Scanner Technologies Corp. v. ICOS Vision Systems Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- National Diamond Syndicate, Inc. v. Flanders Diamond USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.