State v. Phillips
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Defendant first contends that the State failed to prove a crime under G.S. 14401.11(a)(2) because coffee is not a “food or eatable substance.” We disagree.
G.S. 14401.11(a) states that
It shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly distribute, sell, give away or otherwise cause to be placed in a position of human accessibility, any food or eatable substance which that person knows to contain:
* * * *(2) Any controlled substance included in any schedule of the Controlled Substances Act.
*529Defendant’s argument that coffee is a “beverage” and not a “food or eatable substance” is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. GaitenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. ScogginSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- State v. BumperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. QuickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997