Legal Opinion

State v. Phillips

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 2, 1988No. 8724SC722PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendant first contends that the State failed to prove a crime under G.S. 14401.11(a)(2) because coffee is not a “food or eatable substance.” We disagree.

G.S. 14401.11(a) states that

It shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly distribute, sell, give away or otherwise cause to be placed in a position of human accessibility, any food or eatable substance which that person knows to contain:

* * * *(2) Any controlled substance included in any schedule of the Controlled Substances Act.

*529Defendant’s argument that coffee is a “beverage” and not a “food or eatable substance” is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. GaitenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. State v. ScogginSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. State v. BumperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. QuickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API