Legal Opinion

State v. Crespin

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 1980No. 4581PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENDLEY, Judge.

Summary affirmance was proposed by notice filed April 22, 1980. The defendant has filed a timely memorandum opposing affirmance as to one issue and does not oppose affirmance on the other issue.

The defendant claims error in the trial court’s refusal to require the State to place on the record its reasons for exercising a peremptory challenge against the only black member of the jury venire. This case raises an issue of first impression in New Mexico.

Generally, the reason underlying a party’s exercise of a peremptory challenge is unreviewable since the reasons may,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Castaneda v. PartidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. People v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Peters v. KiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Ex Parte BranchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. State v. NeilSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  4. People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API