Legal Opinion
J. A. Mohr & Son v. Alliance Securities Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 7, 1926No. 4793PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The patent here in suit, No. 1,196,691, issued August 29, 1916, to Blake F. Hopkins, was for a means for distributing liquids, and particularly designed as an air brush for spraying paint upon surfaces to be painted. Its object was to provide means whereby liquid under pressure may pass out of a distributing nozzle and at the same time an independent air outlet may be provided whereby the amount of air furnished at the nozzle can be controlled irrespective of the amount of liquid used. We approve the conclusions of the court below in which upon a careful consideration…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Naylor v. Alsop Process Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. StickneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Frey v. Marvel Auto Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
- Hale & Kilburn Mfg. Co. v. Oneonta, Cooperstown & Richfield Springs Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1904
- MacClemmy v. Gilbert Corset Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Gulf Smokeless Coal Co. v. Sutton, Steele & Steele.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
- Alliance Securities Co. v. De Vilbiss Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- Steiner Sales Co. v. Schwartz Sales Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- Crosley Corp. v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Payne Furnace & Supply Co. v. Williams-Wallace Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.