Lloyd v. Morrison

Wickersham, J.,

The plaintiff in the above-stated case, on May 26, 1930, filed his lien against the defendants, owners or reputed owners, and against the building therein described, and curtilage appurtenant *778thereto, for the payment of a debt due him as architect in the erection and construction of said building. It is alleged in paragraphs four and five of the lien as follows:

“4. The work done by the claimant was by virtue of an oral contract, the terms of which were that the claimant should prepare plans and specifications for the building hereinafter described.

“5. The nature of the work…