Legal Opinion

Reilly v. Andro

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stevens, J.(1) Sec. 360.22 of the Statutes provides that when a person accused of a criminal offense is acquitted he shall immediately be discharged; “and if the court before whom the trial is had shall certify in his docket that the complaint was wilful and malicious and without probable cause it shall enter a judgment against the complainant to pay all the costs that shall have accrued to the court and sheriff or constable and jury, and the fees of witnesses in the proceedings had upon such complaint.”

When a justice of the peace pronounces judgment orally at the close of the trial he has a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Langen v. BorkowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Boring v. OttWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Balch v. BeachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Robertson v. ParkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Kleinsteuber v. SchumacherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wasserman v. City of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Ada Enterprises, Inc. v. ThompsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. In Re PerryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  4. State ex rel. Perry v. GarechtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Wernick v. RothWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API