Branagan v. Buckman
New York Supreme Court
Action for an injunction to restrain the defendants from interfering with plaintiff’s use of their telephone line.
1Opinion of the CourtComan, J.
Sometime prior to the month of April, 190-9, the defendants in this action, nine in number, together with one E. A. Foster, were farmers residing in the same neighborhood in the town of Stoekhridge, in this county. Their farms were located on what is known as St-ockhridge West Hill and somewhat off the- main thoroughfare passing through said town from north to south. They were without the convenience of telephone service and agreed among themselves to construct a line which should run from the village of Munnsville to their respective residences; that each should furnish the poles to be used…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ostrom v. . GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Lafond v. . DeemsNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Wait v. . BorneNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- McKane v. AdamsNew York Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by11 opinions
- Harris v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- United States v. American Medical Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Sergeant v. Goldsmith Dry Goods Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1920
- Greenwood v. Building Trades CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Venus Lodge No. 62 v. Acme Benevolent Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.