Legal Opinion

Nadorff Bros. v. City of Louisville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 7, 1911PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

— Affirming.

Appellants, Nadorff Bros., who conducted a saloon at No. 221 South Second street, in the city of Louisville, were cited to appear before the License Board of that city to show cause why their license to retail liquors should not be revoked for selling liquor on Sunday, Au-’ gust 28, 1910, in violation of section 1303 of the Kentucky Statutes. After hearing the evidence, the License *136Board revoked appellants’ license. On appeal to the Criminal Division of the Jefferson Circuit Court the judgment of the License Board was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Paducah v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hyman v. BoldrickCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  2. Belsinger v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1969
  3. Donald K. Belsinger v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  4. Cassidy v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  5. Donald K. Belsinger v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API