Legal Opinion
Hyman v. Boldrick
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided March 21, 1913PublishedCited by 21 opinions
Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas, First Division).
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Chief Justice Hobson
Affirming.
The following ordinance is dn force in the city of Louisville: ' '
“An ordinance regulating the hours for the transaction of business of pawn brokers, second-hand dealers, junk merchants and junk dealers in the city of Louisville.
“Be it ordained by the General Council of the City of Louisville:
“Sec. 1. It shall be unlawful for any pawn broker, second-hand dealer, junk merchant or junk dealer to keep *78open his store or place of business for the transaction of .any business pertaining to such occupations, or to engage in it, conduct or carry on…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Soon Hing v. CrowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Fifth Ave. Coach Co. v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Hopper v. StackSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
- Bradford v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
- Peterson v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Cash Inn of Dade, Inc., a Florida Corporation, D/B/A Cash U.S.A. North v. Metropolitan Dade County, a Political Subdivision of the State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- People v. GibbsMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Biddles, Inc. v. EnrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- State Ex Rel. Newman v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
- Mansbach Scrap Iron Co. v. City of AshlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.