Legal Opinion
Alaniz v. Zamora-Quezada
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 21, 2009No. 07-40325PublishedCited by 111 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OWEN, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from a jury verdict rendered against Dr. Jorge Zamora-Quezada (Zamora) and his clinics for sex discrimination and retaliation against four female employees. We affirm the judgments for three Appellees but reverse for insufficient evidence to support Noelia Galvan-Santiago’s (Galvan) quid pro quo claim.
I
Dr. Jorge Zamora owns and operates an osteoporosis and arthritis practice consisting of two clinics. Four former employees, Thelma Alaniz, Galvan, Mary Tipton, and Angelica Solis, brought Title VII sexual harassment claims against Zamora and the clinics.
A
Ala…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- McCoy v. City of ShreveportCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by111 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Boh Bros. Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Ronald Reed v. Neopost USA, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Michael Baisden v. I'm Ready Productions, Inc., etCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Medina County Environmental Action Ass'n v. Surface Transportation BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- Streamline Production Systems, Inc. v. Streamline Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.