Davies v. Courtney
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Chief Judge.
The parties to this controversy are honorable and trustworthy. The evidence indicates that they were friends for a long time. Their method of borrowing and repaying monies, was, to say the least, inexact. The appellees are husband and wife and the appellant an itinerant barber who lived with them on various occasions.
The appellees borrowed monies at different times from the appellant, various notes were signed to evidence the loans, and numerous repayments were made. Repayments were made by depositing the monies to the bank account of the appellant. The first note was made…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Richards Development Company v. SlighArizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Arizona Land Title & Trust Co. v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Rental Development Corp. of America v. Rubenstein Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Aztec Film Productions v. Tucson Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Boyle v. WebbArizona Supreme Court · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lancaster v. Chemi-Cote Perlite CorporationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Alberts v. HCA Inc. (In Re Greater Southeast Community Hospital Corp. I)District Court, District of Columbia · 2007