Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Jay v. next47 Services Gmbh

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided August 30, 2018No. 1:18-cv-10267Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-10267-RWZ ANDREW JAY v. SIEMENS AG, SIEMENS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS and SIEMENS NEXT 47 GMBH MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER August 30, 2018 ZOBEL, S.D.J. Plaintiff Andrew Jay, formerly an at-will employee of defendants, alleges wrongful constructive discharge in retaliation for his internal report of extortion. Defendants move to dismiss his single-count complaint. I. Factual Background The following well-pleaded facts are recited as alleged in the complaint. I accept them as true for the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Ocasio-Hernandez v. Fortuno-BursetCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  4. Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. Rodriguez-Reyes v. Molina-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API