Tracinda Corp. v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER AG
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON EVIDENTIARY ISSUES
FARNAN, District Judge.
During the course of the bench trial in the above-captioned action, the Court reserved judgment on several evidentiary objections raised by the parties. The parties have briefed their respective positions, and this Memorandum Opinion constitutes the Court’s rulings with regard to the pending evidentiary matters.
I. DEFENDANTS’ POST-TRIAL EVI-DENTIARY OBJECTIONS
A. Motion To Exclude Testimony And Reports Of Tracinda’s Experts, Professor William L. Silber And H. Conrad Meyer, III,
Defendants contend that the testimony of Tracinda’s…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Williams v. Borough of West ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- United States v. RylanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Paul Lamont Parham v. Marshall Johnson, Jr., Medical Doctor Charles J. Kozakieqicz Tom Forester, Commissioner Joseph Mazurkiewicz, ph.dCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Greenspan v. LADT LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Sass ex rel. American Home Mortgage Plan Trust v. Vector Consulting, Inc. (In re American Home Mortgage Holdings, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Celebrity Cruises, Inc. v. Essef Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Suter v. General Accident Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
- Rivera v. Incorporated Village of FarmingdaleDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.