Legal Opinion

Silverstein v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins.

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided September 2, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, District Judge.

Defendant, by order to show cause granted May 20, 1936, moves to enjoin and restrain plaintiff from taking any further proceedings in the above-entitled case in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Essex, in the Fourth Judicial District of the State, in which the action was brought, unless and until the cause shall be remanded to that court. Plaintiff by cross-notice of motion moves this court to remand this cause to the state court.

Both motions were returnable June 6, 1936, at Albany, and by agreement argument was postponed to July 13, 1936, at Albany.

T…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. CastleSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. David Belasco Co. v. KlawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  5. In re LandauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marking v. New St. Louis & Calhoun Packet Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1943
  2. Nyberg v. Montgomery Ward & Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1954
  3. City of Buffalo v. Spann Realty Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API