Legal Opinion

Rediker v. Queen Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1895PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Schoolcraft; Steere, J. Assumpsit by Paul Rediker against the Queen Insurance Company of America on a fire-insurance policy. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff recovered a judgment upon a policy of insurance, from which the defendant appealed. The policy was issued to the plaintiff and one Miller, his partner. Subsequently plaintiff bought Miller’s interest in the property, and took an assignment of the policy from the firm. At the time of the assignment, the plaintiff gave a chattel mortgage upon the property, to secure a loan. The consent to the assignment of the policy appeared in writing upon the policy, the plaintiff having procured it from defendant’s agent. The plaintiff testified that he “left the policy with the agent, at the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Beebe v. Ohio Farmers' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lord v. National Protective SocietyMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Bryant v. Granite State Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Cronin v. Fire Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Inventasch v. Superior Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1927
  5. Kotwicki v. Thuringia InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API