Legal Opinion

Cardillo v. Torquato

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 1947No. Appeal, 154Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Arnold, J.,

The principal question here is whether the defendants, private bankers, were agents of the plaintiff, or contracted to perform an independent undertaking under a receipt of the defendants. Defendants’ place of business was in the borough of Windber, Pennsylvania. The plaintiff desired to establish a credit in the Postal Savings Bank of Italy, and for that purpose gave American money to the defendants, who signed a receipt: “Received from Mr. Mauro Catena Cardillo, Italian Lire twenty-six thousand for deposit with the Postal Savings Bank of Rome, for account of Mauro…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Conrad's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Randolph v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Richard v. American Union BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Richard v. American Union BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  5. Keller v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API