Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Neal

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 11, 2014No. 13-1335PublishedCited by 219 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff appeals from the dismissal of his pro se civil rights suit (see 42 U.S.C. § 1983) for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). He is an Illinois prison inmate who had been transferred to the Pinekneyville Correctional Center from the Big Muddy Correctional Center. The defendants are employees of the two prisons — Davis, Doty, Neal, Selby, and Woodside are employed by Big Muddy, and Alvis by Pinekneyville. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of all the defendants. We discuss the claim…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pavey v. ConleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  2. Pavey v. ConleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  3. Peter Lewis v. Odie Washington, Director, Illinois Department of Corrections, Mary Nichols, Richard Gramley, Lieutenant Shaw, and Lieutenant JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  4. Rodger Thornton v. Donald N. Snyder, Jr., Director, James M. Schomig, Warden, and Captain Josh J. ShettleworthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005

3Cited by219 opinions

  1. Richard Wagoner v. Indiana Department of CorrectiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  2. Ramirez v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  3. Raynard Jackson v. Dane EsserCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
  4. Howard Smallwood v. Don WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
  5. Robert Williams v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020

214 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API