Buell Realty Note Collection Trust v. Central Oak Investment Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
BATEMAN, Justice,
The question here is whether the owner or mortgagee is entitled to money paid as compensation for land condemned for public use. Appellees were the owners of a tract containing 114,019 square feet, which they had purchased for $735,000, of which $185,000 was paid in cash. Appellant holds a vendor’s lien note for the balance of $550,000, due in April, 1974. The City of Dallas condemned 10,793 square feet for which it paid $140,000 into the registry of the county court. The controversy was submitted to the district court, and at the conclusion of a nonjury trial the court…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Humphreys-Mexia Co. v. GammonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Travelers Insurance v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Langever v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Simonton v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1899
- Carey v. StarrTexas Supreme Court · 1900
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Beutel v. Dallas County Flood Control District, No. 1, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1996
- Olivares v. Birdie L. Nix Trust, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2003
- People ex rel. Department of Transportation v. Redwood Baseline, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Wynnewood Bank and Trust v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
- Pima County v. Ina/Oldfather 4.7 Acres Trust 2292Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.