Herzog v. City of New Ulm
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
Certiorari to review a decision of the industrial commission dated May 21, 1936, denying relator’s petition that respondents pay the balance of monthly payments, due to her under an award of compensation upon agreement dated May 14, 1928. John F. Herzog, a policeman of New Ulm, sustained injuries on February 16, 1928, from which he died on February 18, 1928. His death was com-pensable under the workmen’s compensation act. The award, entered by agreement, contains provisions that his widow, Mary Her-zog, and relator, Frances Herzog, an adult daughter, were wholly dependent…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Warner v. ZaiserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Roos v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Rosenquist v. O'Neil & PrestonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Johnson v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Falconer v. Central Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ogren v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Elsenpeter v. PotvinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Jovanovich v. St. Paul Corrugating Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937