Legal Opinion

Bankers State Bank v. New Jersey Fidelity & Plate Glass Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 21, 1931No. Gen. No. 34,904Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson

This was an action to recover on an insurance policy-known as a burglar policy issued to the Savoy Ball Booms, Inc., under which a loss occurred in the amount of $5,110.05, on the morning of November 13, 1928. The claim under the policy was subsequently assigned to the Banker’s State Bank, plaintiff herein, as security for a loan negotiated by the Savoy Ball Booms, Inc. The policy limited the loss to $7,500 and contained, among other things, a clause entitled, “Special protection to avoid ‘Hold-up’ is adopted as follows: ‘Two Armed guards on duty at all times while said Policy is in force.’ ”…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Healey v. Mutual Accident Ass'n of the NorthwestIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Niagara Fire Insurance v. ScammonIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Terwilliger v. National Masonic Accident Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Kaplan v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Fee v. Zurich General Accident & Liability InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API